LG vs. Lawyers: What Led to the Ongoing Delhi Advocates’ Protest?

On August 13, 2025, the Lieutenant Governor of Delhi issued a controversial notification allowing police officers to present evidence virtually from police stations, without appearing before the court judge. This move was seen by lawyers as a gross violation of fair trial standards and judicial transparency. They argue that withholding witness behavior and demeanor during cross-examinations severely hampers justice.

How Did the Legal Community Respond?

• Starting August 22, the Coordination Committee of All District Courts Bar Associations called for a complete strike across all Delhi district courts—Tis Hazari, Rohini, Saket, Dwarka, Patiala House, Rouse Avenue, and others. Law firms, prosecutors from ED, CBI, and police agents were barred from entering courts as a sign of protest.
• The Delhi High Court Bar Association also opposed the LG’s order, declaring it against the fundamental principles of justice.
• As the strike continued into its fifth day, advocates ramped up their protests—organizing black ribbon campaigns, burning effigies of the LG, and holding public demonstrations. Court proceedings remain stalled, causing serious delays for litigants and undertrial prisoners.

Why Lawyers Are Deeply Concerned

Lawyers argue that recording police depositions from remote police stations could undermine the judicial process, increase the risk of coercion or manipulation of evidence, and weaken fair trial norms. They insist that in-person testimony is critical for effective cross-examination.

Summary Table